Sponsored by

HOME

FAQ LIBRARY CONTACT ABOUT     Last updated: August 01, 2010

Online Guide to

The Parallel Flow Intersection

A New High Capacity Traffic Intersection Design

U.S. Patent No. 7,135,989

 


What do you think about the paraflow?
Please take a minute to express your opinion.


Paraflow Questionnaire



Don't see the video? Get Adobe Flash Player here >>

Example Paraflow
US-23 @ Campus View Boulevard, Columbus, Ohio

Type of Paraflow >> 2-Phase / 4-Leg Partial
Total Vehicles Per Hour >> 7,893
Average Vehicle Delay Per Hour >> 18 seconds
Average Number of Vehicle Stops >> 0.42

The Ohio Department of Transportation is currently planning to construct
a trench under three intersections including Campus View (above) that is estimated to cost over $80 million.
A paraflow would cost under $20 million.

A questionnaire respondent writes, 'I think that your usage of the US-23/Campus View intersection as a potential use for this design is misleading.  Although it would solve the problem of traffic backing up on Campus View by adding additional queue length for the left-turning vehicles, it would not address the problem of northbound traffic backing up on US-23, which is exactly what the trench is designed to do.  Although the paraflow is cheaper to build, it would still leave a major design flaw in the current pattern unaddressed.'

The VISSIM simulation shown above is an accurate prediction of how the paraflow would operate using future traffic data supplied by the Ohio DOT. The reason the paraflow should work at this location is due to the simultaneous Campus View eastbound thru/left movements and Campus View westbound left turn movement (south junction).

The number of signal phases is effectively reduced with more green time for the US-23 through movements. Reducing the number of signal phases also reduces lost time due to fewer all-red phases and less start-up time. The simulation shown above accurately represents this and shows a resulting Level of Service B in the design year 2028. No traffic would therefore back up onto I-270.

- Greg
 

So, just how much time could a paraflow save? A lot!
As the figure below shows, delay at a congested signal can be reduced by over 80%.



View a short presentation here

 


Check this out!


Can an intersection have less delay than an interchange (including the freeway traffic that has no delay)?
The answer is, 'Yes!'
The paraflow intersection can have less overall delay than even a single point urban interchange.

Find out how here >>
 

 
 

The paraflow is a new kind of intersection...

The parallel flow intersection (or paraflow) is an innovative signalized street intersection that operates with only two or three phases per repeating signal cycle.

 

 
 

that attacks traffic congestion...

By reducing congestion at busy intersections, the paraflow can make them safer to drive, reduce travel time otherwise spent in queue, and lower vehicle emissions. Compared to an interchange, the paraflow is smaller and costs less but can still process substantial traffic volumes.

 
 

using a simple idea...

The underlying idea is simple; left turns bypass the main intersection by first turning onto a cross street frontage road. View >>

By removing left turns from the main intersection, the paraflow can operate with only two phases per cycle. Conventional traffic signals require four phases per cycle at busy intersections to provide for left turns. With only two phases, the paraflow is far more efficient.

 
 

to produce very green results.

In fact, the paraflow can operate using a 60 second cycle length with as much as 50 seconds of green time dedicated to thru movements generating potentially 10 times more capacity than an equivalently sized conventional signalized intersection.

 

 
 

For more information about the paraflow, go to the Library page where you will find reference materials, research, illustrations and simulations. Click here to go to the Library >>

 
       
     

WHAT'S NEW

April 2010

Paraflow included in FHWA publication, Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR) on unconventional junction designs.

January 2010

TRB 89th Annual Meeting. Research paper by Edara, Dhatrak and Bared titled Performance Analysis of Parallel-Flow Intersection and Displaced Left-Turn Intersection Designs (#10-3158) comparing capacity of paraflow and CFI.

October 2009

Paper by Greg published in the Fifth Advanced Forum on Transportation of China title "The Parallel Flow Intersection: A New High Capacity Urban Intersection". An introduction to the parallel flow intersection to Chinese transportation professionals.

August 2009

"Considering the accessibility and land use problems of the CFI, the [paraflow] is a good alternative to reduce the average delays, which is comparable to the CFI, and as well reduce the property impact and cost."

From a research paper by the University of Maryland presented at the 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2008, Beijing, China.
Download (1.2MB) >>

CONSIDER THAT...

Converting a conventional signalized intersection to a paraflow can reduce delay by over 80%.

A 'T' type intersection requires only one leg of the intersection to be arranged as a paraflow.

A conventional signalized intersection has 32 conflict points compared to 28 for a paraflow.

An existing conventional signalized intersection can be converted to a paraflow with no detours and minimal traffic interruption.

The paraflow is about 50% smaller than a continuous flow intersection of similar capacity.

All vehicle movements are intuitive and direct at a paraflow unlike other unconventional designs.

Drivers make their left turn nearly from the same place as with a conventional intersection.

 

 

PARAFLOW VISUALS

Click on image to enlarge.

© 2009 Greg Parsons. All Rights Reserved.
Terms and Conditions of Use