Type of Paraflow >> 2-Phase /
4-Leg Partial
Total Vehicles Per Hour >> 7,893
Average Vehicle Delay Per Hour >> 18 seconds
Average Number of Vehicle Stops >> 0.42
The Ohio Department of
Transportation is currently planning to construct
a
trench
under three intersections including Campus View (above) that is
estimated to cost over $80 million.
A paraflow would cost under $20
million.
A questionnaire respondent
writes, 'I think that your usage of the
US-23/Campus View intersection as a potential use for this
design is misleading. Although it would solve the problem
of traffic backing up on Campus View by adding additional
queue length for the left-turning vehicles, it would not
address the problem of northbound traffic backing up on
US-23, which is exactly what the trench is designed to do.
Although the paraflow is cheaper to build, it would still
leave a major design flaw in the current pattern
unaddressed.'
The VISSIM simulation shown above is an
accurate prediction of how the paraflow would operate using
future traffic data supplied by the Ohio DOT. The reason the
paraflow should work at this location is due to the
simultaneous Campus View eastbound thru/left movements
and Campus View westbound left turn movement (south
junction).
The number of signal phases is effectively
reduced with more green time for the US-23 through
movements. Reducing the number of signal phases also reduces
lost time due to fewer all-red phases and less start-up
time. The simulation shown above accurately represents this
and shows a resulting Level of
Service B in the design year 2028. No traffic
would therefore back up onto I-270.
- Greg
So, just how much time could a paraflow
save? A lot!
As the figure below shows, delay at a congested signal can
be reduced by over 80%.
Check this out!
Can an intersection have less delay than
an interchange (including the
freeway traffic that has no delay)?
The answer is, 'Yes!'
The
paraflow intersection can have less
overall delay than even a single point urban
interchange.
The parallel flow
intersection (or paraflow) is an innovative signalized street
intersection that operates with only two or three phases per
repeating signal cycle.
that attacks traffic congestion...
By reducing congestion at
busy intersections, the paraflow can make them safer to
drive, reduce travel time otherwise spent in queue, and
lower vehicle emissions. Compared to an
interchange, the paraflow is smaller and costs less but can
still process substantial traffic volumes.
using a simple idea...
The underlying idea is
simple; left turns bypass the main intersection by first
turning onto a cross street frontage road.
View >>
By removing left turns from
the main intersection, the paraflow can operate with only two
phases per cycle. Conventional traffic signals require four
phases per cycle at busy intersections to provide for left turns. With
only two phases, the
paraflow is far more efficient.
to produce very
green results.
In
fact, the paraflow can operate using a 60 second cycle length with as much
as 50
seconds of green time dedicated to thru movements generating potentially
10 times more capacity than an equivalently sized conventional signalized
intersection.
For more information about the
paraflow, go to the Library page where you will find
reference materials, research, illustrations and
simulations. Click here to go to the
Library >>
WHAT'S NEW
April 2010
Paraflow included in FHWA
publication, Alternative
Intersections/Interchanges:
Informational Report (AIIR) on
unconventional junction designs.
January 2010
TRB 89th Annual Meeting.
Research paper by
Edara, Dhatrak and
Bared titled Performance Analysis of
Parallel-Flow Intersection and Displaced
Left-Turn Intersection Designs
(#10-3158) comparing capacity of
paraflow and CFI.
October 2009
Paper by Greg published in the Fifth
Advanced Forum on Transportation of
China title "The Parallel Flow
Intersection: A New High Capacity Urban
Intersection". An introduction to
the parallel flow intersection to
Chinese transportation professionals.
August 2009
"Considering the accessibility and land
use problems of the CFI, the [paraflow]
is a good alternative to reduce the
average delays, which is comparable to
the CFI, and as well reduce the property
impact and cost."
From a research
paper by the University of Maryland
presented at the 11th International IEEE
Conference on Intelligent Transportation
Systems, 2008, Beijing, China.
Download (1.2MB)
>>
CONSIDER THAT...
►
Converting a
conventional signalized intersection to a paraflow can
reduce delay by over 80%.
►
A
'T' type
intersection requires only one leg of the intersection to be
arranged as a paraflow.